Oxford academics sign free speech letter amid gender row involving Kathleen Stock

Amid a debate invitation controversy, University of Oxford academics emphasize the importance of open discussion of contentious views in universities.

Speculation arose regarding the split between the university’s student union and the Oxford Union debating society, which some believed was connected to the invitation. However, the Oxford University Student Union clarified that the decision was unrelated.

The letter, published in the Telegraph and signed by 44 academics representing diverse viewpoints, strongly criticized the split between the students’ union and the long-standing Oxford Union debating society. The signatories expressed their full condemnation of this decision.

Renowned figures such as evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins are among the notable signatories of the letter. Dr. Michael Biggs, an associate professor of sociology at the University of Oxford and one of the signatories, emphasized his support for academic freedom of speech as the reason behind signing the letter in an interview with the BBC.

He expressed concern that academic freedom of speech was being endangered by the emergence of a group of students who consider any opposing viewpoint as hateful and bigoted, denying them the opportunity to express their views.

Prof Stock expressed her satisfaction with the response to the letter, stating that she was glad to see individuals at Oxford University who recognize the importance of preserving academic freedom and are willing to publicly demonstrate this fundamental value.

She expressed her hope that their actions would inspire others to do the same.

Education Minister Claire Coutinho stated in a statement that student debaters should not face consequences for promoting the free exchange of ideas.

She stated that the forthcoming Freedom of Speech Act “will ensure that universities actively uphold freedom of speech,” and individuals whose free speech rights are unlawfully limited on campus will have the opportunity to seek remedies.

After facing student protests due to her book’s publication, where she questioned the notion that gender identity is more socially significant than biological sex, Professor Stock stepped down from her role at the University of Sussex in 2021.

In response to the unveiling of plans to invite Prof. Stock, the Oxford University LGBTQ+ Society expressed their dismay and accused the debating union of prioritizing free speech over the well-being of LGBTQ+ members. In a statement on Wednesday, the society reiterated their stance and criticized the Oxford Union for providing a platform to Prof. Stock, considering it an insult.

The Oxford Union has stated that attendees of the event on 30 May will have the chance to engage and challenge Prof. Stock’s views in a respectful manner. They will also have the option to ask questions anonymously. Additionally, the Union has made additional welfare resources available for the event, acknowledging its sensitive nature.

The letter from academics described Prof. Stock’s views as recognizing the reality and social significance of biological sex in humans. It highlighted that such views were once widely accepted and did not require explicit assertion. The letter emphasized that any notion of academic freedom or free speech should not deem these views as beyond the boundaries of acceptable discourse.

According to the letter, the decision of the student’s union to ban the Oxford Union debating society from freshers’ fairs is an attempt to undermine the society’s business model.

The letter highlighted that freshers’ fairs play a crucial role in recruiting new members for the society. It also clarified that the Oxford Union is a separate entity from both the University of Oxford and the student union, operating as a private members club with its own independent status.

The letter expressed that the decision to oppose Prof Stock and the subsequent split with the Oxford Union is a significant departure from the principles of free inquiry and the unbiased pursuit of truth through rational debate.

The Oxford University Student Union responded by clarifying that the national press coverage incorrectly merged the opposition to Prof Stock with the decision to separate from the Oxford Union.

The student’s union clarified that the pre-decision debate did not reference Prof Stock or any specific speaker.

Rather, the decision was motivated by longstanding concerns regarding issues such as alleged bullying, sexual harassment, discrimination, and data privacy breaches.

The union affirmed its commitment to safeguarding freedom of expression and supporting the inclusion of controversial and unpopular ideas as an essential aspect of university life.



Source : bbc.com


By Ryan

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *